Key result
Home-based cardiac rehabilitation referral linked to ~17% lower 1-year all-cause hospitalization.
Why the study?
Referrals to and participation in cardiac rehabilitation programs remain suboptimal, and factors associated with home-based cardiac rehabilitation referral and participation and their outcomes need examination.
Does referral to and participation in home-based cardiac rehabilitation reduce hospitalizations and mortality in adults with a qualifying cardiac event?
Cohort (n=44,468)
Does referral to and participation in home-based cardiac rehabilitation reduce hospitalizations and mortality in adults with a qualifying cardiac event?
Home-based cardiac rehabilitation referral and participation are associated with significantly lower risks of all-cause and cardiovascular hospitalizations up to one year, though referral rates remain suboptimal for older adults and women.
Cardiac rehab referral was associated with lower 180-day hospitalization; supports broader use but leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Background Referrals to and participation in cardiac rehabilitation programs remain suboptimal. We examined factors associated with home‐based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) referral and participation and associations of referral and participation with outcomes. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we included adults ≥18 years of age from Kaiser Permanente Southern California with a HBCR‐qualifying event or procedure between January 2021 and September 2024. HBCR referral and, separately, participation was identified within 90 days. Outcomes included 30‐, 180‐, and 365‐day hospitalizations and all‐cause mortality. Results Among 44 468 adults, 13 164 (29.6%) received a referral within 90 days. Those receiving versus not receiving a referral were younger (mean age 65.6 versus 70.6 years) and more often male (71.4% versus 59.5%). Referral was associated with a lower likelihood of 180‐day all‐cause and cardiovascular disease hospitalization (prevalence ratio [PR], 0.86 [95% CI, 0.82–0.91] and PR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.66–0.82]), and 365‐day all‐cause and cardiovascular disease hospitalization (PR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.79–0.86] and PR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.66–0.75]). Participation was associated with a lower likelihood of 30‐day all‐cause hospitalization (PR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.66–0.92]), 180‐day all‐cause and cardiovascular disease hospitalization (PR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.75–0.91] and PR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.74–0.98]), and 365‐day all‐cause and cardiovascular disease hospitalization (PR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.82–0.96] and PR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.78–0.98]). Conclusions Older adults and women had lower HBCR referral highlighting persistent gaps. Lower hospitalization risk associated with timely HBCR referral and participation underscores the importance of appropriate patient screening to improve outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mefford et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in HBCR-qualifying event or procedure (n=44,468). Home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) referral vs. No referral was evaluated on 365-day all-cause hospitalization (PR 0.83, 95% CI 0.79-0.86). Home-based cardiac rehabilitation referral was associated with a lower likelihood of 365-day all-cause hospitalization compared with no referral (PR 0.83; 95% CI 0.79-0.86).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: