Key result
Home-based cardiac rehabilitation availability linked to ~80% higher participation versus community referral alone.
Why the study?
Cardiac rehabilitation is underutilized among patients with ischemic heart disease despite guideline recommendations, and the impact of home-based programs on participation is unclear.
Does the availability of home-based cardiac rehabilitation programs improve cardiac rehabilitation participation rates in veterans with ischemic heart disease?
Cohort (n=405,907)
Yes
Does the availability of home-based cardiac rehabilitation programs improve cardiac rehabilitation participation rates in veterans with ischemic heart disease?
Odds Ratio: 1.8 (95% CI 1.75–1.84)
Absolute Event Rate: 20% vs 14.3%
The availability of virtual home-based cardiac rehabilitation programs at VA facilities is associated with significantly higher overall participation in secondary prevention programs following ischemic heart disease events.
Home-based CR availability was associated with higher participation; extends delivery model evidence in veterans but leaves open causal effects.
Importance Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a guideline-recommended secondary prevention program that reduces morbidity and mortality among patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) yet remains underutilized. Over the past decade, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has implemented strategies to increase CR participation, including expansion of virtual home-based CR (HBCR) programs as alternatives to traditional center-based CR (CBCR). Objective To examine temporal trends and factors associated with CR participation among veterans with IHD. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used national VHA electronic health record data to evaluate CR participation among veterans hospitalized for IHD, identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9 ), ICD-10 , or Current Procedural Terminology codes from 2012 to 2022. Data were analyzed from October 25, 2025, to July 25, 2026. Exposures Availability of CR delivery models at Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities, including referral to community care programs only, VA CBCR, or VA HBCR. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the proportion of eligible veterans with acute myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery who participated in any type of CR within 12 months of the index event, identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes and VA stop codes from VA-provided, VA-purchased, or Medicare-claimed services. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with CR participation. Results Among 405 907 veterans with IHD (mean [SD] age, 68.5 [11.1] years; 391 998 men [96.6%]), 63 185 (15.6%) participated in CR. Participation increased from 9.6% in 2012 to 17.1% in 2022, with a peak of 19.7% in 2018. In 2022, participation was higher at facilities offering HBCR (20.0%) compared with those offering CBCR without HBCR (14.8%) or referral to community care programs only (14.3%). The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of participation among veterans treated at facilities offering HBCR was 1.80 (95% CI, 1.75-1.84), whereas the AOR of participation at facilities offering CBCR without HBCR was 1.29 (95% CI, 1.26-1.32) compared with referral to community care programs only. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of veterans with IHD, participation in CR nearly doubled between 2012 and 2022. Patients who had index events at facilities offering HBCR had higher CR participation than those at facilities offering CBCR without HBCR, or at facilities offering only referral to community care. Broader availability of HBCR programs may help improve participation within large health systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Ischemic heart disease (n=405,907). Availability of home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) vs. Referral to community care programs only was evaluated on Participation in any type of cardiac rehabilitation within 12 months of the index event (AOR 1.80, 95% CI 1.75-1.84). Availability of home-based cardiac rehabilitation was associated with higher rehabilitation participation compared with referral to community care only (AOR 1.80; 95% CI 1.75-1.84).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: