Key result
Home-based cardiac rehabilitation options linked to ~2-fold higher participation rates than facility-based coverage.
Why the study?
How did cardiac rehabilitation participation trends and demographic predictors compare between Veterans Affairs patients and Medicare beneficiaries with stable heart failure from 2012 to 2022?
Cohort (n=670,613)
Yes
How did cardiac rehabilitation participation trends and demographic predictors compare between Veterans Affairs patients and Medicare beneficiaries with stable heart failure from 2012 to 2022?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Following VA implementation of home-based cardiac rehabilitation and Medicare facility-based coverage expansion, CR participation increased among veterans with stable HF (to 13.2% in 2016-2022) but remained low among Medicare beneficiaries (6.7%), suggesting Medicare coverage of home-based CR could improve participation.
Background: Heart failure (HF) affects 6.7 million American adults and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a behavior modification program recommended to improve health outcomes in patients with HF. In 2014, Medicare began covering facility‐based CR for patients with stable HF, and some Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities began offering home‐based CR. Methods: We conducted an observational study to assess CR participation among patients with stable HF and patient characteristics associated with participation. National electronic health record data from the VA and claims data from a 5% Medicare sample were used to identify patients using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision ( ICD‐9 ) or Tenth Revision ( ICD‐10 ) codes. CR participation was determined using Current Procedural Terminology codes and VA stop codes during the 12 months following HF diagnosis. A multivariable logistic regression was constructed to identify patient characteristics associated with participation. Results: From 2012 to 2022, VA participation increased from 7.4% to 10.4% and Medicare decreased from 7.4% to 5.1%. From 2016 to 2022, 13.2% of veterans and 6.7% of Medicare beneficiaries with stable HF participated in CR. Older age, female sex, and non‐White race were associated with lower participation, and comorbid ischemic heart disease was associated with greater participation (odds ratio [OR], 1.48 [95% CI, 1.45–1.52] in VA; OR, 2.69 [95% CI, (2.62–2.78] in Medicare). Conclusions: Following the VA's implementation of home‐based CR and Medicare's facility‐based CR coverage for stable HF, participation increased among veterans but not among Medicare beneficiaries. Lower participation was observed among women and non‐White patients. These findings suggest that covering home‐based CR could improve participation among Medicare beneficiaries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hunegnaw et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Stable heart failure (n=670,613). Veterans Affairs health care enrollment (with home-based cardiac rehabilitation availability) vs. Medicare fee-for-service coverage (facility-based cardiac rehabilitation coverage only) was evaluated on Participation in ≥1 cardiac rehabilitation sessions from 2016 to 2022. Cardiac rehabilitation participation from 2016 to 2022 was 13.2% among veterans with home-based options compared to 6.7% among Medicare beneficiaries with facility-based coverage.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: