Key result
All of Us cohort shows ~12-point lower age-adjusted hypertension prevalence compared to NHANES.
Why the study?
The generalizability of findings from the All of Us Research Program requires benchmarking cardiovascular risk factors and disease prevalence against national estimates.
Cross-Sectional
Yes
Absolute Event Rate: 19.7% vs 31.7%
The All of Us cohort shows distinct demographic patterns and age-adjusted cardiovascular disease prevalences compared to national NHANES estimates, with variation depending on whether conditions are ascertained via survey or electronic health records.
Benchmarks All of Us cardiovascular estimates against NHANES; leaves open generalizability for precision-medicine inferences in underrepresented groups.
Background The AoU (All of Us) Research Program aims to accelerate precision‐medicine research. To provide context for the generalizability of findings we benchmarked cardiovascular risk factors and established cardiovascular disease prevalence in AoU against nationally representative estimates. Methods We included AoU participants enrolled between May 2017 and June 2022 and the NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) 2017 to March 2020 cycle. The AoU Survey cohort included participants who completed the Personal and Family Health History survey (N=185 232). AoU EHR included participants with linked electronic health record (EHR) (N=287 012). We identified cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular disease through survey questions in AoU Survey and NHANES, and Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine codes for AoU EHR. Results AoU Survey and AoU EHR were older than NHANES (56.1±17 years and 57.6±17 years versus 47.5±18 years) with more female participants (64% and 60% versus 51.8%). Black participants were underrepresented in AoU Survey (9.1%) and overrepresented in AoU EHR (19.9%); 11.5% in NHANES. Prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities in AoU Survey and NHANES were similar but lower in AoU Survey when age adjusted (eg, hypertension 31.7% in NHANES versus 19.7% in AoU Survey, diabetes 11.3% versus 8%). Black participants had higher unadjusted rates of hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure than NHANES. AoU EHR with its code‐based identification had higher unadjusted prevalence of most cardiovascular comorbidities; differences attenuated with age‐adjustment. Conclusions AoU includes more historically underrepresented groups, but representation varies by whether cohorts are defined by survey versus EHR availability. Further, disease prevalence can change based on how conditions are ascertained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular risk factors and disease. All of Us (AoU) Survey cohort vs. NHANES was evaluated on Age-adjusted prevalence of hypertension. The All of Us Survey cohort had lower age-adjusted prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities compared to NHANES, including hypertension (19.7% vs 31.7%) and diabetes (8% vs 11.3%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: