Why the study?
The human intestinal Caco-2 cell line clones exhibit different metabolic capabilities relevant to dietary lipid and cholesterol processing, necessitating functional characterization to improve their use in lipid nutrient studies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We aimed to improve the use of the human intestinal Caco-2 cell line for studying dietary lipid and cholesterol processing by using isolated pure clones (Chantret et al. 1994). Three clones (TC7, PD7 and PF11) were grown as monolayers on semi-permeable filters and compared for cell viability, fatty acid and cholesterol apical uptake or basolateral secretion, apolipoprotein B-48 basolateral secretion and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA reductase activity. The TC7 clone showed the best viability upon apical incubation with mixed micelles and should be preferred for routine work. Short-term (3.0 h) rates of apical uptake of cholesterol were not different with the three clones, whereas the rate of apical uptake of oleic acid (18:1) was lower (P<0.05) with PF11 (250.6 nmol/mg) and the basolateral secretion of cholesterol and oleic acid was lower with the TC7 clone (0.40 and 29.1 nmol/mg respectively). The secretion of apolipoprotein B-48 basolaterally was about 2-fold lower than from PD7 clone. The basal levels of HMG-CoA reductase activity were significantly different (P<0.05; TC7>PF11 >PD7). The down-regulation of the enzyme activity was moderate (range 13.8-21.0%) and comparable in the presence of apical micellar cholesterol, but was much marked upon basolateral incubation with LDL (range 34.0-53.6%), especially for the PD7 clone. In conclusion, the Caco-2 clones characterized here proved to be particularly suitable for studying lipid nutrients processing. Because these three clones exhibit some different metabolic capabilities, they provide a new tool to study intestinal response to lipid nutrients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salvini et al. (2002) studied Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Pediococcus pentosaceus MZF16 vs. Pseudomonas aeruginosa H103 alone was evaluated on C. elegans survival rate at day 8 post-infection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: