A BSTRACT Objectives: Higher adherence to enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols improves outcomes, but real-world anesthetic ERAS data remain limited. This study examines anesthesia-influenced ERAS for colorectal surgery. Materials and Methods: Data from 131 patients receiving colorectal minimally invasive surgery (January 2020–November 2021) at Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital were analyzed. Patients were categorized as non-ERAS, pre-ERAS, or ERAS based on adherence to 25 ERAS components. Primary and secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), pain, PONV, bowel recovery, and morphine use. Results: ERAS adherence rates were 91.8% (ERAS), 58.4% (pre-ERAS), and 40.0% (non-ERAS) ( P < 0.0001). The ERAS group had the shortest LOS (4.09 days, P < 0.0001), lowest pain and morphine use, reduced PONV (0%, P = 0.001), and fastest bowel recovery. Conclusion: Surgical ERAS care facilitates functional recovery, whereas anesthetic ERAS care further improves ERAS adherence and postoperative recovery by reducing pain, lowering PONV incidence, and accelerating the return of bowel function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: