Key result
ANDES trial evaluates community health worker-led intervention vs usual care for blood pressure reduction.
Why the study?
Hypertension is the most common cardiovascular disease in Peru despite the availability of cost-effective, evidence-based treatment, necessitating evaluation of a CHW-led hypertension control program within the national primary care system.
Does a 12-month community health worker-led home-based hypertension control program reduce systolic blood pressure compared to usual care in adults with uncontrolled hypertension in Peru?
RCT (n=1,068)
Single-blind (Outcome assessor blinded)
1:1 stratum-stratified permuted block randomization
Yes
Does a 12-month community health worker-led home-based hypertension control program reduce systolic blood pressure compared to usual care in adults with uncontrolled hypertension in Peru?
This study protocol outlines a trial to evaluate the real-world implementation and effectiveness of a community health worker-led, multicomponent hypertension control strategy in a high-altitude, resource-limited setting.
BACKGROUND: Hypertension is the most common cardiovascular disease in Peru despite the availability of cost-effective, evidence-based treatment. Here we describe the rationale and study design for a hybrid type 2 randomized controlled trial to test the implementation and effectiveness of a community health worker (CHW)-led hypertension control program within the national primary care system in Puno, Peru. METHODS: We will recruit 1068 adult participants with hypertension aged ≥ 18 years in Puno, Peru, via facility-based enrollment and community health fairs. Participants will be individually randomized (1:1) to either continue with usual care or participate in a 12-month CHW-led home-based hypertension control program consisting of blood pressure monitoring, medication adherence support, and healthy lifestyle counseling. Outcome development and reporting are guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, and the Proctor et al. framework. Clinical effectiveness outcomes include mean change in systolic blood pressure (primary outcome), diastolic blood pressure, and HbA1C. Implementation outcomes include fidelity (i.e., CHW protocol adherence and dose), reach, adoption, sustainability, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: The ANDES trial is testing the first CHW-led multicomponent strategy for hypertension and type 2 diabetes management in Peru. This type 2 hybrid trial will provide critical insights into the individual, community, and system-level factors necessary for successful implementation and effectiveness. These data can inform the future adaptation and scaling of the ANDES strategy in Peru and other LMICs, as well as influence policies at the system level to support this transition. Furthermore, by addressing both hypertension and diabetes, the ANDES strategy supports integrated care approaches advocated by the WHO HEARTS technical package, ultimately enhancing health outcomes and reducing morbidity and mortality in the region. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT05524987 , Addressing Hypertension and Diabetes through Community-Engaged Systems in Puno, Peru (ANDES study), prospectively registered on September 1, 2021.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Underhill et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Hypertension (n=1,068). ANDES hypertension control program (community health worker-led home visits) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Mean change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to 12 months. The ANDES community health worker-led hypertension control program is currently being evaluated in a study protocol for its effectiveness in reducing systolic blood pressure compared to usual care, with clinical results pending.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: