Key result
Strong family cohesion and resilience boost antihypertensive adherence, while conflict and depression impair it.
Why the study?
High blood pressure control rates in Latin America are often below international standards due to complex psychosocial barriers affecting adherence to antihypertensive treatment.
How do family functioning and psychological well-being influence adherence to antihypertensive treatment in hypertensive patients?
Systematic Review (n=43)
How do family functioning and psychological well-being influence adherence to antihypertensive treatment in hypertensive patients?
Adherence to antihypertensive treatment is a complex phenomenon deeply dependent on family dynamics and psychological well-being, suggesting isolated biomedical models are insufficient and should be replaced by family-centered intervention models.
Assessing family dynamics and mood may improve antihypertensive adherence counseling; confirms psychosocial targets for intervention trials.
The main objective of this study is to examine the explanatory models that link family functioning and psychological well-being with adherence to antihypertensive treatment. High blood pressure remains a critical global public health challenge, particularly in Latin America, where control rates often fall below international standards due to complex psychosocial barriers. Methods: This study adopted a qualitative systematic review design following the PRISMA protocol. A total of 43 articles published between 2020 and 2024 were identified across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO. Data were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis, supported by ATLAS.ti and VOSviewer to map conceptual clusters and bibliographic networks. The findings reveal that therapeutic adherence is a multidimensional phenomenon shaped by interrelated factors. The bibliometric analysis identified a peak in scientific production in 2024, which represented 25.6% of the studies. High levels of family cohesion and effective communication were consistently associated with improved adherence, whereas family conflict and excessive control constituted significant barriers. At the psychological level, anxiety, depression, and chronic stress reduced adherence, while resilience and perceived control operated as protective mechanisms. Integrative models showed that family dynamics modulate individual psychological states, which demonstrates that isolated biomedical perspectives are insufficient to explain patient behavior. Adherence depends on a complex interaction among clinical, family, and psychological dimensions. To improve cardiovascular outcomes, health systems must move toward systemic and family-centered intervention models that combine biomedical care with social and emotional support. These findings provide a more comprehensive framework for the design of effective public health policies and community-based programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manga et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Hypertension (n=43). Family functioning and psychological well-being was evaluated on Adherence to antihypertensive treatment. High family cohesion, effective communication, resilience, and perceived control consistently improved adherence to antihypertensive treatment, whereas family conflict, anxiety, and depression served as barriers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: