Key result
Clear roles, structured tools, and mutual trust define successful pharmacist-GP co-care in hypertension.
Why the study?
No co-care service for hypertension management involving pharmacists, general practitioners, and patients is currently available in Switzerland despite high rates of uncontrolled blood pressure.
A co-care model for hypertension management in primary care requires mutual trust, structured collaboration, and shared electronic health records between pharmacists, GPs, and patients to be successfully implemented.
May inform co-care model design for hypertension; leaves open feasibility and outcomes in Swiss primary care.
Introduction: In Switzerland, more than 80% of diagnosed individuals with hypertension are prescribed at least one blood pressure-lowering agent, yet 60% have uncontrolled blood pressure. To address this burden, co-care has been shown to improve systolic blood pressure control and to be cost-effective. Currently, no co-care service for hypertension management involving pharmacists, general practitioners (GPs), and patients is available in Switzerland. Aim: This qualitative study aimed to identify key elements supporting the future development of a co-care service for chronic hypertension management, informed by healthcare professionals' (HCPs) and patients' perspectives and experiences. Methods: This participatory study included semi-structured interviews with six pharmacists and six GPs, and a focus group of six patients with hypertension. Recruitment targeted diverse Swiss regions and practice settings to capture multiple perspectives and help shape the co-care service. Transcripts were coded using thematic analysis. Results: Pharmacists, GPs, and patients identified effective communication, mutual trust, and clear role differentiation as key elements to support the future development of a co-care service. Structured collaboration tools, such as shared hypertension guidelines, were viewed as necessary to support interprofessional collaboration. Improved information sharing, potentially through an electronic health record, was seen as key to care coordination, although concerns about data security remained. Contextual barriers, including political factors, highlighted the need for local implementation strategies. Conclusion: The key elements of a future co-care service for chronic hypertension management depend on mutual trust, a local and shared way of communication and collaboration among HCPs and patients, combined with a holistic patient-centered approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mulder et al. (2026) studied Hypertension (n=18). Exploration of co-care service (qualitative study) was evaluated on Key elements supporting the future development of a co-care service for chronic hypertension management. Participants identified effective communication, mutual trust, structured collaboration tools, and clear role differentiation as key elements to support a future co-care service for hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: