Key result
A structured, multi-modal interprofessional training program was highly rated by 17 community pharmacists (median satisfaction score of 1 out of 7) and increased their confidence in delivering a hypertension management service.
Why the study?
Does a tailored inter-professional training program improve community pharmacists' readiness to deliver a targeted hypertension management service?
Observational (n=17)
Does a tailored inter-professional training program improve community pharmacists' readiness to deliver a targeted hypertension management service?
A structured, multi-modal training program involving simulated and inter-professional learning is effective and well-received in preparing community pharmacists to implement hypertension management services.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High satisfaction supports training feasibility; leaves open whether it improves pharmacists' hypertension service readiness.
BACKGROUND: Non-adherence to medicines by patients and suboptimal prescribing by clinicians underpin poor blood pressure (BP) control in hypertension. In this study, a training program was designed to enable community pharmacists to deliver a service in hypertension management targeting therapeutic adjustments and medication adherence. A comprehensive evaluation of the training program was undertaken. METHODS: Tailored training comprising a self-directed pre-work manual, practical workshop (using real patients), and practice scenarios, was developed and delivered by an inter-professional team (pharmacists, GPs). Supported by practical and written assessment, the training focused on the principles of BP management, BP measurement skills, and adherence strategies. Pharmacists' experience of the training (expectations, content, format, relevance) was evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively. Immediate feedback was obtained via a questionnaire comprising Likert scales (1 = "very well" to 7 = "poor") and open-ended questions. Further in-depth qualitative evaluation was undertaken via semi-structured interviews several months post-training (and post service implementation). RESULTS: Seventeen pharmacists were recruited, trained and assessed as competent. All were highly satisfied with the training; other than the 'amount of information provided' (median score = 5, "just right"), all aspects of training attained the most positive score of '1'. Pharmacists most valued the integrated team-based approach, GP involvement, and inclusion of real patients, as well as the pre-reading manual, BP measurement workshop, and case studies (simulation). Post-implementation the interviews highlighted that comprehensive training increased pharmacists' confidence in providing the service, however, training of other pharmacy staff and patient recruitment strategies were highlighted as a need in future. CONCLUSIONS: Structured, multi-modal training involving simulated and inter-professional learning is effective in preparing selected community pharmacists for the implementation of new services in the context of hypertension management. This training could be further enhanced to prepare pharmacists for the challenges encountered in implementing and evaluating services in practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bajorek et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Hypertension management (Pharmacist training) (n=17). Interprofessional training program was evaluated on Pharmacists' experience and satisfaction with the training (measured via 7-point Likert scales). A structured, multi-modal interprofessional training program was highly rated by 17 community pharmacists (median satisfaction score of 1 out of 7) and increased their confidence in delivering a hypertension management service.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: