Inverter-based resources (IBRs) alter fault behaviour in medium-voltage (MV) networks, while heterogeneous monitoring devices operating at different sampling rates provide different bandwidths and representations of fault transients, complicating consistent feature formulation for data-driven fault diagnostics. This study develops a sampling-frequency-aware wavelet–statistical framework for fault detection, classification and location (FDCL). Voltage and current signals from 1800 simulated cases spanning six fault categories on a 33 kV radial feeder were sampled at 120 kHz, with anti-aliased decimation producing datasets at 12 and 1.2 kHz. Six Nyquist-valid feature families were extracted at each sampling rate, from which compact subsets were formulated using minimum-redundancy maximum-relevance (MRMR) and ReliefF feature selection. Four supervised machine-learning (ML) models—decision tree, k-nearest neighbour (KNN), bagged-tree ensemble and neural network—were evaluated for classification and regression using an 80/20 train–test split. Classification remained comparable across sampling tiers, with best test accuracies of 94.9%, 95.1% and 94.9% at 1.2, 12 and 120 kHz, respectively. Regression was more configuration-dependent: the 12 kHz full-feature neural network achieved the lowest unseen-location root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 2.603 km, with mean absolute error (MAE) = 1.845 km and coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.992, while MRMR-20/KNN retained a comparable RMSE of 2.659 km. Selected features shifted from predominantly wavelet descriptors at lower rates towards high-frequency band-energy descriptors at 120 kHz without improved prediction. The results show that increasing sampling bandwidth expands the observable frequency content but does not guarantee improved diagnostic accuracy; predictive performance depends on sampling frequency, physically valid feature formulation, feature selection and learner choice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Onyedikachi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: