This study examines change in operational efficiency and productivity across a balanced panel of 15 container ports for the years 2019 and 2020. Berth length, gantry cranes, and other cranes are inputs; high container throughput is desirable, and extended anchorage waiting time is undesirable. Waiting time is calculated as the unweighted mean of weekly port estimates published by the Asian Development Bank. A pooled convex variable-returns-to-scale directional distance function with weak disposability provides a common reference technology, and the VRS global Malmquist–Luenberger (GML) index compares the two years. The mean transformed efficiency score was 0.855 across 30 port-year observations, declining from 0.878 in 2019 to 0.833 in 2020. The arithmetic mean GML score was 0.951: one port improved, ten declined, and four remained unchanged. A throughput-only model and leave-one-port-out re-estimation show that waiting time treatment and influential reference ports affect individual comparisons. In particular, the omission of Shanghai or Tanjung Pelepas substantially changed some rankings and scores.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: