BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Kinesio tape (KT) for managing central facial paralysis (CFP) in adults. METHODS: In this randomized single-blind clinical trial, 121 patients with a 1st stroke event between June 2023 and September 2024 were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups (1:1:1 ratio): stimulated group (SG, KT + routine rehabilitation), sham stimulated group (SSG, KT with no tension applied + routine rehabilitation), and control group (CG, routine rehabilitation without KT). All 3 groups received routine rehabilitation therapy, with SG and SSG receiving additional KT treatment. The treatment lasted for 4 weeks, followed by a 4-week follow-up period. House-Brackmann grading scale score, Sunnybrook facial grading system, Burres-Fisch system, facial disability index, functional oral intake scale, and food residue condition were assessed at baseline (T0), after 4 weeks (T1), and 8 weeks (T2). RESULTS: At T1, all groups showed significant improvements in House-Brackmann grading scale, Sunnybrook facial grading system, Burres-Fisch , facial disability index, and functional oral intake scale scores versus T0 (P < .05). The SG demonstrated superior therapeutic gains across all metrics except FOIS compared to SSG/CG (effect size: 1.15-2.90, P < .001), with benefits sustained through T2 (T1 vs T2 within SG: P > .05). Moreover, SG showed superior oral-phase efficacy (67.5% vs 45.0%/35.0% food residue condition level 0, P < .05). No significant differences emerged between SSG and CG at any timepoint (P > .05). No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that tension-applied KT (25%-50% stretch) significantly improves facial symmetry (static/dynamic) and swallowing efficiency in CFP, with sustained benefits ≥4 weeks. Superior to SSG/CG, KT proves a safe adjunct therapy, enhancing motor function and quality of life in CFP rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: