This article investigates immigrant political integration in Italy through the lens of Multi-Level Governance (MLG), examining whether a framework so far applied mainly to socio-economic integration and refugee reception also illuminates the political dimension, and how its core dynamics unfold there. Building on three concepts associated with MLG in immigrant integration studies – the local turn, governance decoupling, and battleground – the article examines how these unfold when the focus shifts from service provision and social inclusion to political participation and representation, drawing on national policy analysis and a case study of immigrant consultative bodies in the Italian region of Emilia-Romagna, focusing on the city of Parma. The findings confirm the relevance of the local turn and governance decoupling, but in a more pronounced form than in socio-economic integration, whereas the battleground dimension proves the most distinctively reshaped in this policy field, mobilizing a partially different constellation of actors and introducing stronger internal fragmentation within immigrant constituencies. The analysis reveals a broader weakening of immigrant councils in Italy – marked by declining activity, a shift from elected to appointed membership, and persistent ambiguity over their representative mandate – as institutional retrenchment unfolds within a broader process of “permanent crisis” (crisification). The article contributes to MLG theory by exposing distinctive governance dynamics challenging representation, legitimacy, and voice under conditions of weak institutional consolidation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Campomori et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: