The bias-voltage dependence of surface stress on metal electrodes is a long-standing observable that bridges electrochemistry and surface mechanics, yet its first-principles modelling has long been hampered by the difficulty of defining a constant–electron-chemical-potential ensemble under three-dimensional periodic boundary conditions. In this article we revisit our recent work [Hagiwara, Ishibashi, and Otani, Phys. Rev. B 110, 155409 (2024)] from a thermodynamic and conceptual perspective. We first clarify why the macroscopic stress tensor is a derivative of the Helmholtz free energy and why Nielsen–Martin's strain Hellmann–Feynman construction survives when an effective-screening-medium (ESM) boundary condition is applied. We then show how the grand-potential view naturally reproduces the Lippmann and Gokhshtein relations from first principles, and discuss the layer-resolved local stress that reveals a Friedel-oscillation-correlated response several layers deep. We close with prospects toward solid–liquid interfaces, where electric double layers, specific adsorption, and dynamic effects remain open challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Minoru Otani (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: