Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Heterogeneous unmanned aerial vehicle–unmanned surface vehicle (UAV–USV) formations must reject disturbances while maintaining prescribed tracking performance and responding to collision risks. This study develops a mathematically consistent framework for one UAV leading three CyberShip II USVs. A unified adaptive observer uses a radial basis function network to approximate the disturbance derivative while explicitly retaining approximation and reconstruction residuals. A regularized double-signed-power sliding surface removes the zero-point singularity of its fractional-power derivative, and compact UAV and stacked-USV control laws preserve the prescribed-performance transformation. External-obstacle and pairwise artificial potential fields are embedded as planar coupled inputs. A composite Lyapunov analysis retains observer, sliding, transformed-error, topology, and potential-field coupling terms and gives a conditional regional practical fixed-time entrance bound under explicit gain and bounded-input conditions; it does not assert exact convergence, collision-free invariance, or satisfaction of these conditions by the numerical gains. In the retained original 350 s comparison, the proposed UAV integral absolute error (IAE) in the x-direction was 1.1217, compared with 3.7739 for the reference control. These traceability data are unchanged and do not constitute a newly rerun matched-baseline assessment of the corrected controller, a continuous-time safety proof, or physical validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hongqing et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: