Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multi-axis additive manufacturing (MA-AM) enables the support-free fabrication of continuous fiber reinforced composites (CFRC), but practical implementation requires coordinated planning of slicing layer geometry, fiber toolpath topology, and manipulator kinematics. This study develops an integrated process-planning framework that links these stages through constraint forwarding. A vector field optimization (VFO) model accounts for overhang, directional variation, and stress alignment when generating curved slicing layers. Fragmented stress-aligned contours are then connected through Eulerian graph reconstruction to form a continuous fiber toolpath without retraction between disconnected deposition segments. At the robot-planning stage, a layer-wise kinematic optimizer exploits rotation about the printing nozzle axis to avoid low-manipulability configurations and reduce joint variation. Collision-witness verification further identifies layers that require local geometric regeneration. In repeated coupon tests ( n = 3 per group), the proposed fiber toolpath produced a mean ultimate load of 610.00 ± 6.24 N, representing increases of 28.4% and 8.4% over the 45° and 30° raster baselines, respectively. The layer-wise kinematic strategy reduced Total Joint Variation (TJV) by 17.22% relative to point-wise inverse kinematics (IK). In the closed-overhang case, two accepted feedback updates increased the minimum signed clearance from −1.016 to 13.492 mm at the sampled IK waypoints under the capsule–voxel model. This sampled result does not constitute a continuous-time collision certificate. The results show that slicing geometry, fiber toolpath topology, and robotic execution can be coordinated within a unified offline planning framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: