Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pelvic pain may persist despite guideline-concordant endometriosis care. Evidence for primary motor cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (M1-rTMS) in this population is limited. We assessed daily pain and activity interference, treatment delivery and safety after clinically indicated M1-rTMS. A prospective, single-centre observational cohort enrolled women with confirmed endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain. Ten left M1-rTMS sessions were scheduled over two weeks (10 Hz, 80% resting motor threshold, 1500 pulses/session). Daily diaries recorded pelvic pain and activity interference during pre-treatment, treatment, and post-treatment days 1–28 and week 8. Changes were estimated using linear mixed-effects models. Forty-two participants were enrolled and 40 initiated treatment; analyses included 37 for pain and 35 for interference. Model-based marginal mean pain decreased from 5.69 to 4.69 (change, −1.00; 95% CI, −1.46 to −0.55; p < 0.001), and interference from 6.03 to 4.63 (change, −1.39; 95% CI, −1.84 to −0.95; p < 0.001). Both remained below pre-treatment at week 8. Ten of 34 evaluable participants achieved ≥30% pain reduction and three achieved ≥50%. Of the 400 planned sessions, 386 were delivered; a total of 33/40 participants attended all ten and 38/40 at least eight. Twenty-eight participants reported 47 treatment-emergent adverse events; one was severe, none was serious, and all were resolved. M1-rTMS was feasible to deliver with high protocol fidelity and acceptable tolerability. Modest reductions in pain and activity interference were observed, although clinically important pain relief occurred in a minority; without a sham, usual-care, or untreated comparator, these changes cannot be attributed causally to rTMS. Controlled trials are required to determine efficacy and optimal dosing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Popescu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: