Land surface temperature (LST) is closely linked to land–atmosphere energy exchange, while conventional point forecasting cannot quantify forecast uncertainty or explicitly enforce physical consistency over long horizons. We propose Physics-former-Rn-SG to address two limitations: fixed physical penalties cannot adapt to state-dependent forecast reliability, while directly coupling uncertainty to physics weighting can encourage variance inflation. The model integrates a variable-wise iTransformer, NIG evidential prediction, supervised future -forcing heads, and a reduced Rn-SEB residual. A stop-gradient, normalized, and clipped weighting scheme enables uncertainty-adaptive physical regularization while preventing the physics loss from directly driving variance inflation. Evaluated on MPI-Saale and DE-Gri data from 2024 to 2025, the model achieved the lowest mean MAE in all 16 site horizon combinations across 96–384 h forecasts. Its average absolute MAE advantage was 0.157 °C over NIG-iTransformer and 0.046 °C over fixed Rn-SEB, with the latter improvement smaller and more variable across sites, horizons, and validation protocols. Multi-level coverage error, CRPS, WIS, NLL, and ECE were also lowest. The variance inflation ratio decreased from 1.323 to 1.019 with stop-gradient. In the matched DE-Gri full-flux benchmark, reduced Rn-SEB maintained prediction accuracy while reducing training and inference time by about 11.0% and 6.5%, respectively. Overall, Physics-former-Rn-SG balances forecast accuracy, calibration, and physical consistency, with potential as a station-scale forecasting or post-processing tool for uncertainty-aware environmental applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: