Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of artificial intelligence (AI) assistance on examination efficiency and ergonomics during cardiac sonography. Materials and Methods: Randomized, cross-over study design was used with an ultrasound equipment system, cardiovascular software, and integrated AI features. A cohort of experienced sonographers (N = 30) performed standardized examinations with and without AI features enabled. All participating sonographers were new equipment users. Metrics of timing with and without AI assistance were acquired. Movements of the non-scanning hand were recorded during a subset of studies to assess time spent in a predefined ergonomic zone. Results: Artificial intelligence assistance reduced mean examination time by 10.16 ± 0.95 minutes (95% CI, 12.10-8.22; P < .001) independent of experience, age, scanning sequence, or prior AI familiarity. A sub-analysis of hand motion during sonography (n = 9) found AI assistance reduced average distance traveled by 50% (47.9 m) compared with unassisted examinations (SD, 10.6; 95% CI, 39.74-55.97, P < .01). Conclusion: In this cohort of users, AI-assisted cardiac sonography significantly reduced acquisition time and increased time spent within their optimal hand reach. This kind of upgrade may help lower the risk of work-related musculoskeletal injuries in cardiac sonographers. Further studies, based on actual clinical settings, would help to further clarify these benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Armour et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: