This study examines whether higher temporal resolution and more flexible model specification improve short-horizon forecasting of aggregate U.S. listed-real-estate exchange-traded fund returns. Using release-aware daily, monthly, and quarterly predictors, we evaluate VNQ as the primary target and IYR as a closely related robustness proxy over one-, two-, and four-week horizons, with a fixed 2022–2025 out-of-sample period. Seven forecasting systems are compared, including a Historical Mean benchmark, ARX-Ridge, Weekly LSTM, MIDAS-ADL, Mixed-Frequency VAR, Frequency-Specific LSTM, and Cross-Frequency Attention. Weekly-versus-native comparisons are interpreted as system-level contrasts, while a separate matched daily predictor experiment provides a narrower sensitivity check on sampling resolution. The Historical Mean achieves the lowest RMSE in all six target–horizon cases. The system-level comparisons show no consistent advantage for native-frequency implementations, and the matched experiment likewise provides no general evidence that retaining daily resolution improves forecasts. MIDAS-ADL exhibits specification-specific long-horizon instability associated with amplified fitted contributions, particularly from the monthly block, although annual re-estimation substantially attenuates this behavior. Forecast performance, therefore, depends jointly on temporal representation, model specification, information integration, and updating policy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suprihadi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: