Accessible tourism is increasingly recognised as a condition of socially sustainable development, yet its documented provision does not necessarily enable its usability. This conceptual paper develops an Inclusive Tourism Sustainability Framework (ITSF) through a structured, purposive synthesis of accessibility chain, capability, inclusive tourism, economic and island studies literature. The contribution is integration and operational refinement, not a new general theory or an empirical validation. The physical, digital, economic and institutional–social conditions form a configuration whose indispensable links must meet user-specific requirements at the time of travel. A threshold model separates journey feasibility from subsequent choice, while a generalised utility formulation distinguishes monetary costs, time, effort and risk. Six untested propositions connect this core mechanism to participation and, conditionally, to welfare, firm and destination outcomes. Operational indicators, a source-to-proposition map and a clearly labelled hypothetical coastal illustration show how the framework could be implemented. The accessibility dividend is defined as a non-additive family of outcomes: commercial gains need not imply improved affordability or equity. Island and coastal conditions, including limited substitutes, weather-related disruptions and conservation constraints, bound the proposed relationships. Accessibility remains independently justified by rights; improvements in competitiveness, resilience and sustainability require separate evidence rather than being presumed consequences of investment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Angeliki N. Menegaki (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: