Digitalization has become an important factor influencing economic growth, productivity, employment, innovation and the structural transformation of economies. The expansion of broadband networks, cloud computing, digital platforms, artificial intelligence, big data analytics, digital financial services and other information and communication technologies has changed the organization of production and the allocation of economic resources. This article examines the mechanisms through which digitalization contributes to economic growth and structural transformation, with particular attention to productivity, innovation, sectoral reallocation, labor markets, trade and the development of digital services. The study is based on a review and comparative analysis of evidence from the World Bank, OECD, International Telecommunication Union, UN Trade and Development and peer-reviewed academic literature. The evidence indicates that digital technologies can increase productivity by reducing transaction costs, improving information flows, facilitating automation, supporting innovation and expanding access to markets. However, the economic effects of digitalization are not automatic. Productivity gains depend on complementary investments in human capital, organizational capabilities, physical and digital infrastructure, competition and institutional quality. Digitalization can also contribute to structural transformation by facilitating the movement of economic activity toward higher-productivity manufacturing and service activities and by creating new digitally enabled occupations and business models. At the same time, differences in connectivity, affordability, digital skills and access to capital can cause the benefits of digital transformation to be distributed unevenly. The article concludes that digitalization should be treated not simply as technological modernization but as a broad economic transformation requiring coordinated policies in infrastructure, skills, innovation, competition and data governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ogli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: