Effective porosity is a key petrophysical parameter, yet a well without a measured sonic (DT) curve cannot support sonic porosity calculation or seismic-to-well ties. This study presents a physics-informed neural network (PINN) that jointly synthesizes a DT log and predicts porosity for three Niger Delta wells, none of which carries a measured sonic curve. A shared-trunk, dual-head architecture produces both outputs from one representation. Gardner’s equation, the Wyllie time-average equation, and a density-porosity cross-check act as physics terms in the loss function. Aleatoric uncertainty comes from a heteroscedastic likelihood and epistemic uncertainty from a five-member deep ensemble with Monte Carlo dropout, which together give a predictive uncertainty band for every porosity value. These bands are Gaussian-approximation predictive intervals, not confidence intervals, and they have not been recalibrated. Under leave-one-well-out cross-validation against a no-physics ablation and a Random Forest baseline, the PINN outperforms the no-physics ablation on every held-out well (R² = 0.938, 0.682, and 0.806 on Jay_01, Jay_02, and Jay_03, versus 0.881, 0.592, and 0.691) and is competitive with the Random Forest baseline, trailing narrowly on Jay_01 (0.938 vs 0.943), leading narrowly on Jay_02 (0.682 vs 0.678), and leading clearly on Jay_03 (0.806 vs 0.753). No measured sonic log exists for validation, so the accuracy of the synthetic DT curves remains unverified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Babalola et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: