Background: Early recognition and management of burns are essential, yet access to technologically complex simulation may be limited in resource-constrained educational settings. Methods: We developed a resource-conscious simulation scenario for the initial management of adult burns, established its content validity, and evaluated its implementation across three Brazilian public universities. Nine experts assessed content validity, and post-intervention evaluation included 48 nursing students. Perceived simulation design quality, perceived educational effectiveness, satisfaction, and self-confidence were measured. Results: The scenario demonstrated adequate content validity (S-CVI/Ave = 0.86). Median scores were 4.60/5.0 for design quality, 2.63/3.0 for perceived educational effectiveness, 4.80/5.0 for satisfaction, and 4.38/5.0 for self-confidence. Perceived design quality correlated positively with perceived effectiveness (ρ = 0.557; 95% CI 0.317–0.731), satisfaction (ρ = 0.711; 95% CI 0.529–0.831), and self-confidence (ρ = 0.612; 95% CI 0.390–0.767; all p < 0.001). After adjustment for age, region, and previous simulation experience, each one-point increase in design rating remained associated with a 0.43-point increase in perceived effectiveness (95% CI 0.17–0.69; p = 0.002). Conclusions: Higher perceived design quality was associated with more favourable self-reported educational outcomes. The scenario was implemented across three institutions, but its effects on knowledge and clinical performance require further evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meschial et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: