Koch and Oesterreicher’s model of ‘Nähe und Distanz’ (‘Nähe’ = immediacy, conceptual orality; ‘Distanz’ = distance, conceptual literacy) is widely used in German linguistics. However, there is no statistical foundation for its use in corpus-linguistic analyses. Theoretically, it is proposed that written texts can be assessed on a scale of conceptual orality and literacy based on linguistic features. Evaluating established features reveals that conceptual orality and literacy must be distinguished in order to rank texts in a nuanced manner. The present approach is theory-guided but not confirmatory and establishes such a scale, emphasizing a statistical implementation that seeks to reflect core theoretical assumptions in practical terms. In comparison with Biber (1988) , this leads to a different and more narrowly framed set of possible applications: not the investigation of conceptual orality and literacy themselves, but rather supportive or controlling functions in corpus compilation and analysis, as demonstrated using the ‘Deutsches Textarchiv’.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Volker Emmrich (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: