Understanding how ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms respond to different nitrogen (N) inputs is crucial for predicting N cycling in fragile ecosystems. This study investigated the responses of ammonia-oxidizing ( amoA ) genes to mineral N addition (+N) and plant litter input (+L), along with the underlying microbial mechanisms, in an N-limited desert steppe over three consecutive years. Both + N and +L treatments significantly increased AOA- amoA abundance, with +N leading to a 164.00% increase and +L to a 58.18% increase by the third year, whereas AOB- amoA exhibited a distinct “suppression–recovery” trajectory under + N (decreasing by 53.54% in year one but ultimately exceeding the CK); litter input consistently enhanced AOB- amoA abundance by 108.71% and 85.89% in the subsequent two years. Nitrososphaerales (Group 1.1b) dominated the AOA population, whereas AOB population dynamics were largely driven by Nitrosomonas . Although diversity and network complexity correlated positively with amoA abundance, network robustness demonstrated the strongest explanatory power, emerging as a key predictor. The AOA network was closely associated with soil organic carbon (path coefficient = 0.183) and total nitrogen (path coefficient −0.385), whereas the AOB network showed a stronger relationship with inorganic nitrogen (path coefficient −0.402). These findings highlight the contrasting substrate preferences of ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms: AOA favoring low, sustained ammonium inputs from litter mineralization, and AOB responding to pulsed inorganic N enrichment. Overall, this study advances our understanding of microbially mediated ammonia oxidation in desert steppes and provides insights to guide sustainable grassland management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: