Accurate characterization of fracture closure dynamics is critical for stimulation optimization in Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS). This study quantifies hydro-mechanical decoupling during post-shut-in closure using synchronized distributed strain sensing (DSS) and pressure diagnostics in four Utah FORGE stages (4, 5, 8, and 9). Our primary objective is to determine whether mechanical closure ( T m e c h ) systematically precedes hydraulic closure ( T h y d ), to quantify decoupling magnitude and variability, and to evaluate whether HMCS can provide physically interpretable closure-stiffness signatures. Mechanical closure is identified from strain-rate decay and hydraulic closure from G-function derivative behavior with manual quality control for complex stages. All stages show T m e c h < T h y d , with decoupling factors of 1.8–3.9 and lag times of 3.4–8.9 min. We further apply a Hydro-Mechanical Closure Stiffness (HMCS) framework based on phase-wise secant stiffness, revealing stage-dependent stiffening behavior and a distinct screen-out signature in Stage 9. This work contributes a reproducible field workflow for DSS-based mechanical closure picking, integrated hydro-mechanical timing diagnostics, and practical HMCS interpretation guidance. Because the dataset is limited (n = 4), conclusions are interpreted as exploratory and mechanistic rather than statistically definitive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: