Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aim: To evaluate the effect of 0.5 and 1% quaternary ammonium silane (QAS), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) on smear layer removal.Methodology: Thirty-six extracted mandibular premolars were standardized to 15 mm root length and instrumented to F3 using Protaper Gold files.Samples were randomly assigned to three groups (n = 12): Group A (0.5% QAS), group B (1% QAS), and group C (17% EDTA).Each canal was irrigated with 5 mL of the assigned solution for 5 minutes.Smear layer removal at coronal, middle, and apical thirds was evaluated under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) using Rödig et al. criteria.Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U test.Results: Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed in smear layer scores among all groups at coronal, middle, and apical third regions.Group A consistently showed the highest smear layer scores (3.08, 3.5, and 3.75), group B intermediate values (2.5, 2.5, and 2.75), and group C the lowest (1.25, 1.25, and 1.42).Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid demonstrated superior overall chelating action, while 1% QAS outperformed 0.5% QAS in deeper regions.Conclusion: Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid remains the most effective irrigant for smear layer removal.Quaternary ammonium silane at 1% concentration showed improved efficacy compared to 0.5% and offers additional antimicrobial and collagen-preserving benefits.Clinical significance: Quaternary ammonium silane, particularly at 1% concentration, demonstrated comparable smear layer removal in deeper canal regions while offering added antimicrobial and collagen-preserving benefits.These multifunctional properties suggest that QAS could streamline irrigation protocols by combining chelation, disinfection, and dentin stabilization in a single solution.Adoption of QAS may reduce dentin erosion and enhance treatment longevity, though further clinical trials are required before routine use can be recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maheswari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: