Background/Objectives: The fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap is an established option for head and neck reconstruction. Preoperative planning requires assessment of donor-limb arterial anatomy and localization of cutaneous perforators. This study describes a structured surgeon-performed Conventional High-Frequency Ultrasound (CHFUS) protocol and evaluates its correlation with intraoperative findings. Methods: This retrospective study included patients undergoing reconstruction with a fibula osteoseptocutaneous free flap between January 2024 and December 2025. A standardized two-phase CHFUS workflow was used to assess infrapopliteal arterial anatomy and identify, characterize, and mark perforators at their deep fascial emergence. Preoperative findings were compared with intraoperative anatomy. Results: Ten patients underwent fibula flap reconstruction. Eighteen perforators were mapped, with a mean of 1.80 ± 0.63 per patient. The most common Kim–Lippert vascular pattern was type I (90%). Mean peroneal artery diameter at its origin was 2.83 ± 0.15 mm, and mean dominant perforator diameter at deep fascial emergence was 1.04 ± 0.14 mm. All 10 patients met the predefined anatomical agreement threshold of ≤1 cm (100%; exact two-sided 95% confidence interval, 69.2–100%). No flap required intraoperative redesign because of perforator anatomy. All flaps survived, without partial skin-paddle necrosis, donor-site ischemia, or vascular complications. Conclusions: This structured surgeon-performed CHFUS protocol was feasible and useful for fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap planning, enabling assessment of arterial anatomy, reliable perforator localization, and translation of preoperative findings into skin-paddle design. CHFUS should be considered complementary to CT angiography. Larger prospective studies are required to evaluate interoperator reproducibility and the diagnostic performance of CHFUS for clinically relevant arterial variants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dente et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: