This study examines whether financial development affects economic growth asymmetrically in Algeria using annual data for 1980–2020. Algeria represents a particularly relevant case because its hydrocarbon dependence, bank-based financial system, strong state involvement in banking, and exposure to oil-price and macroeconomic shocks may shape the finance–growth relationship differently from more diversified economies. The study constructs a composite financial development index using principal component analysis of liquid liabilities, private-sector credit, and bank deposits to GDP (%); the first component explains 81.25% of total variance. A nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) model is estimated with trade openness and government expenditure as controls. Unit-root tests confirm that the variables are I(0) or I(1), and the bounds test supports cointegration (F = 7.455). In the long run, trade openness positively affects growth, whereas government expenditure is statistically insignificant. Positive financial-development shocks are associated with lower long-run growth, although the coefficient is significant only at the 10% level, while negative shocks are insignificant. In the short run, positive shocks generate delayed growth benefits after one and two years. Although the Wald test rejects long-run symmetry within the estimated specification, uncertainty around the individual long-run coefficients warrants interpreting the findings as suggestive evidence of asymmetry that requires further confirmation. Short-run symmetry is not rejected. The error-correction coefficient (−0.674) implies rapid adjustment toward equilibrium. The findings suggest that the quality and productive allocation of financial resources may matter more for growth than financial deepening alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Remmache et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: