Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Despite mandatory reporting laws, discrepancies between the estimated prevalence of child maltreatment and official reports may reflect both under-identification and failure to report recognized concerns. Healthcare professionals face emotional, cognitive, and institutional barriers that may influence reporting willingness. METHODS: This cross-sectional study examined sociodemographic, professional, cognitive, emotional, perceptual, and institutional factors associated with healthcare professionals' self-reported willingness to report suspected child maltreatment. The sample included 272 healthcare professionals caring for children (44% physicians, 43% nurses). Data were collected using a validated anonymous questionnaire. RESULTS: Years of experience were positively associated with identification ability (r = 0.24, p < .001). Women reported higher willingness to report than men (M = 20.97 vs. 18.77, p < .001). Hospital-based staff demonstrated higher self-reported willingness to report than community-based staff (M = 20.74 vs. 18.95, p < .001), and managerial staff demonstrated higher self-reported willingness to report than non-managerial staff (M = 20.96 vs. 20.18, p = .03). Anger toward the child's family was the most common emotional response (44%). More positive perceptions and attitudes, together with greater emotional readiness, were associated with greater self-reported willingness to report suspected child maltreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Female healthcare professionals, professionals with greater clinical experience, hospital-based healthcare professionals, and those in managerial roles reported greater willingness to report suspected child maltreatment. Targeted training incorporating clinical exposure, emotional processing, and ethical decision-making is recommended, particularly for community-based and male professionals. Stronger leadership and organizational support may enhance reporting willingness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greenbaum et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: