Upper secondary education is critical in preparing young people for further study. This paper explores how various upper-secondary education pathways influence students' progression to further study. Using linked English administrative data, we compare progression outcomes across a range of pathways, including the brand new T level hybrid vocational pathway and the increasingly popular mixed (academic and vocational) track. We consider progression across three dimensions – overall progression to further study, progression to high-quality further study and preparedness for further study. The results reveal substantial differences across pathways in the likelihood, type, quality and sustainability of progression opportunities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robbie Maris (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: