Road-transport electrification and driving automation increasingly connect vehicle actions with charging services and urban electricity demand. This review combines two Web of Science Core Collection result sets with abstract-level term analysis and a structured synthesis of technical studies to examine that connection. The broader searches yielded 60,043 and 16,458 records, respectively; recent exports contained 10,926 and 4502 records. Rule-based analysis of nonempty abstracts and the technical synthesis identify four intersections: energy-aware route-charging decisions, station selection and automated access, fleet scheduling, and coupled evaluation. Across the studies examined, vehicle execution, station-session events, and distribution constraints are often represented at different boundaries. The resulting evidence supports a common evaluation of mobility, charging service, and feeder operation, with the five-stage pathway serving as a framework for progressively stronger validation. In a two-hour extreme-condition illustration, on-time charging completion rises from 75.5% without guidance to 97.1% with authorized automated execution, while total vehicle travel time decreases. The review thus identifies measurable interfaces for testing cross-system coordination while keeping field deployment claims tied to their validation level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: