Background Previous studies, including CHARLS analyses, have linked lower peak expiratory flow (PEF) with cognitive decline. Evidence regarding incident score-based cognitive impairment, longitudinal PEF patterns, and incremental prediction remains limited. Objective To examine associations of baseline PEF and exploratory PEF trajectories with incident score-based cognitive impairment and evaluate the incremental predictive value of PEF. Methods The primary analysis included 2604 CHARLS participants aged ≥60 years without score-based cognitive impairment at baseline. Cognitive impairment was defined as a global cognitive score ≥1 SD below the wave- and age-specific mean and was not a clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Cox models, sensitivity analyses, prediction analyses, and exploratory trajectory modeling were performed. Results Over a median follow-up of 9.0 years, 636 participants developed score-based cognitive impairment. Each 1-SD increase in PEF was associated with lower risk in fully adjusted models (HR = 0.801, 95% CI 0.728–0.880) and after adjustment for baseline cognition (HR = 0.846, 95% CI 0.768–0.930). Nine-year cumulative incidence decreased from 35.6% to 16.6% across PEF quartiles. Adding PEF modestly improved 9-year AUC (ΔAUC = 0.011, p = 0.042). In the exploratory trajectory analysis, the moderate PEF group was not significantly associated with risk versus the high group (HR = 1.294, 95% CI 0.860–1.948), whereas the low PEF group had higher risk (HR = 1.817, 95% CI 1.172–2.817), with no clear graded pattern. Conclusions Lower baseline PEF was associated with wave-specific score-based cognitive impairment, but not under stricter definitions requiring subsequent confirmation with wave-specific or fixed thresholds. PEF trajectories were exploratory, and incremental predictive value was limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: