Key result
Chinese Symptom Catastrophizing Scale shows strong validity and reliability in cardiac surgery patients.
Why the study?
No validated Chinese instrument exists to assess symptom catastrophizing in cardiac surgery patients, limiting patient-centered assessment and early risk identification.
Cross-Sectional (n=676)
The culturally adapted Chinese Symptom Catastrophizing Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating maladaptive symptom responses in cardiac surgery patients.
May support psychological risk screening in Chinese cardiac surgery patients; extends Symptom Catastrophizing Scale validation but leaves clinical adoption open pending prospective data.
Background Symptom catastrophizing reflects maladaptive cognitive and emotional responses to physical symptoms and may worsen symptom burden, distress, and recovery. However, no validated Chinese instrument is available for cardiac surgery patients, limiting patient-centered assessment and early risk identification.Objective To translate and culturally adapt a symptom-neutral catastrophizing measure derived from the original Post-concussion Symptom Catastrophizing Scale and evaluate its psychometric properties in Chinese cardiac surgery patients.Methods Following Brislin’s translation model, the scale was translated into Chinese. A convenience sample of 676 cardiac surgery patients was recruited from June to October 2025. Item analysis included critical ratio testing, item-total correlations, and internal consistency evaluation. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency, split-half, and test-retest methods. Content validity was evaluated through expert consultation. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to examine construct validity. Data were analyzed using SPSS 29.0 and Mplus 8.0.Results The adapted Chinese Symptom Catastrophizing Scale demonstrated strong content validity in cardiac surgery patients (S-CVI/Ave = 0.975; CVR = 0.800–1.000). Exploratory factor analysis extracted a three-factor model explaining 79.774% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated acceptable model fit (χ2/df = 2.175, CFI = 0.970, TLI = 0.962, RMSEA = 0.059). Reliability coefficients included Cronbach’s α = 0.936, split-half reliability = 0.894, test-retest reliability = 0.958, and McDonald’s ω = 0.934.Conclusion The Chinese Symptom Catastrophizing Scale demonstrated satisfactory initial reliability and validity evidence in cardiac surgery patients. It provides a brief, standardized, patient-centered measure for identifying maladaptive symptom responses and may facilitate early psychological risk screening, targeted symptom management, and future patient-reported outcome research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiac surgery (n=676). Chinese Symptom Catastrophizing Scale was evaluated on Psychometric properties (validity and reliability). The Chinese Symptom Catastrophizing Scale demonstrated strong reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.936) and validity (CFI = 0.970) for assessing maladaptive symptom responses in cardiac surgery patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: