Key result
LBBP reverses adverse atrial remodeling better than LVSP in canine dyssynchronous heart failure.
Why the study?
The mechanism and comparative effects of left bundle branch pacing versus left ventricular septal pacing on atrial reverse remodeling in dyssynchronous heart failure were not elucidated.
Does left bundle branch pacing or left ventricular septal pacing reverse atrial remodeling in a canine model of dyssynchronous heart failure?
Does left bundle branch pacing or left ventricular septal pacing reverse atrial remodeling in a canine model of dyssynchronous heart failure?
Left bundle branch pacing provides superior reversal of atrial functional and structural remodeling compared to left ventricular septal pacing in a canine heart failure model, potentially explaining its clinical benefit in reducing new-onset atrial fibrillation.
LBBP may enhance atrial function in experimental DHF; leaves open clinical AF reduction pending human trials.
Background Left bundle branch area pacing may reduce new‐onset atrial fibrillation. However, its mechanism and the comparison of atrial reverse remodeling effect between left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) has not been elucidated. We aim to investigate reverse atrial remodeling by LBBP and LVSP in a canine model of rapid pacing‐induced dyssynchronous heart failure (DHF). Methods Twenty‐six beagles followed a 6‐week protocol: controls (n=4), rapid atrial pacing (n=4), DHF (n=6), DHF+LBBP and DHF+LVSP (3 weeks DHF followed by 3 weeks LBBP or LVSP, both n=6). Atrial emptying fraction, functional, and electrophysiological parameters were dynamically assessed. Atrial fibrosis was analyzed in tissue samples. Results Within 3 weeks DHF increased atrial volumes and diminished RA and LA emptying fraction and strains significantly compared with baseline. Subsequent 3 weeks of LBBP increased emptying fraction and strains significantly. At week 6, P‐wave duration was shorter in DHF+LBBP than in DHF. Atrial fibrillation was only inducible in DHF animals. Left atrial appendage levels of collagen I/III and α‐SMA deposition and fibrosis were lower in DHF+LBBP compared with DHF animals. LBBP reversed atrial structural and electrical parameters to the levels in rapid atrial pacing animals. LVSP improved those parameters compared with those in DHF but did not normalize them to the levels in the rapid atrial pacing animals. Conclusions LBBP significantly reverses DHF‐induced functional, cellular, and molecular remodeling in the atria, while a smaller amelioration is achieved with LVSP. The findings may explain the reduction in new‐onset atrial fibrillation after LBBP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weng et al. (2026) studied Dyssynchronous heart failure (n=26). Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) vs. Dyssynchronous heart failure (unpaced), rapid atrial pacing, and controls was evaluated on Atrial emptying fraction, functional and electrophysiological parameters, and atrial fibrosis. Left bundle branch pacing significantly reversed dyssynchronous heart failure-induced functional, cellular, and molecular remodeling in the atria of a canine model compared with left ventricular septal pacing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: