Key result
Paclitaxel-coated balloon plus EPC stent cuts in-stent late lumen loss by ~0.5 mm vs stent alone.
Why the study?
Percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation is limited by restenosis and stent thrombosis, and the impact of combining paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty with EPC stents in de novo coronary artery disease was unclear.
RCT (n=120)
Single-blind
Randomized
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation is limited by the occurrence of re-stenosis and the risk of stent thromboses. OBJECTIVE: To define the impact of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty plus endothelial progenitor cell capturing (EPC) stent implantation in de novo coronary artery disease. This combination may reduce neointimal proliferation within the EPC stent and address the risk of stent thrombosis by facilitating rapid endothelialisation. METHODS: In this prospective single-blind multicentre randomised trial, 120 patients with a de novo lesion in a native coronary artery were randomly assigned to undergo treatment with paclitaxel-coated balloon plus EPC stent or EPC stent alone. Dual antiplatelet therapy was prescribed for 3 months. Angiographic follow-up was scheduled at 6 months. The primary endpoint was in-stent late lumen loss. The secondary clinical endpoint was a composite of death from a cardiac cause, myocardial infarction attributed to the target vessel or target lesion revascularisation. RESULTS: There was no difference in patient baseline characteristics or procedural results. The angiographic follow-up rate was 96%. Treatment with paclitaxel-coated balloon plus EPC stent was superior to EPC stent alone, with an in-stent late loss of 0.34±0.45 mm versus 0.88±0.48 mm (p<0.001). The re-stenosis rate was reduced from 23.2% to 5.1% (p=0.006) and the clinical endpoint was reduced from 17.2% to 4.8% (p=0.039). There was no definite or probable stent thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel-coated balloon plus EPC stent implantation is superior to EPC stent implantation alone for treatment of de novo coronary artery disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00732953.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wöhrle et al. (2011) conducted an RCT in de novo coronary artery disease (n=120). Paclitaxel-coated balloon plus endothelial progenitor cell capturing (EPC) stent vs. EPC stent alone was evaluated on in-stent late lumen loss (p=<0.001). Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty plus EPC stent implantation significantly reduced in-stent late lumen loss to 0.34 mm compared to 0.88 mm with an EPC stent alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: