Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Stoma reversal is often considered a low-risk elective procedure; however, postoperative morbidity remains clinically significant. Evidence identifying predictors of meaningful complications, particularly from resource-limited settings, is limited. AIM: To identify risk factors associated with Clavien-Dindo grade II and above complications following stoma reversal surgery. METHODS: This prospective analytical study was conducted at a tertiary care center between February 2024 and June 2025. Adult patients undergoing elective stoma reversal were included and followed for 30 days postoperatively. Demographic, clinical, and operative variables-including age, etiology, type of index surgery, timing of reversal, type of anastomosis, and anastomosis time-were analyzed. Postoperative complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Secondary outcomes included postoperative ileus and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Clinically significant complications were observed in a substantial proportion of patients. Advanced age and longer anastomosis time were significantly associated with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II complications, postoperative ileus, and prolonged hospital stay. In contrast, type of stoma and anastomotic technique were not independent predictors of high-grade complications. CONCLUSION: Stoma reversal carries a measurable risk of morbidity and should not be regarded as a minor procedure. Patient-related factors and operative complexity play a greater role in determining outcomes than technical variations alone. Careful patient selection, preoperative optimization, and strategies to minimize anastomosis time are essential to improve postoperative outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sangwan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: