Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fibre-reinforced polymers (FRPs) offer a corrosion-resistant alternative to steel, but their long-term durability in alkali-activated concrete (AAC) remains a critical study area with elevated pH levels compared to Portland concrete. To evaluate degradation mechanisms, this study utilizes a three-tier exposure framework: natural FRP embedment in AAC (20°C) for up to 730 days, immersion in chemically replicated AAC pore solution (20°C), and thermal acceleration in the same solution (60°C). Glass (GFRP) and basalt (BFRP) bars were evaluated, isolating fibre and resin vulnerability by comparing single-manufacturer composites with identical vinyl-ester resins alongside commercial epoxy variants with testing the identical neat vinyl-ester under identical environmental conditions. While GFRP demonstrated strong stability across all environments, BFRP variants exhibited substantial deterioration. BFRP-VE specimens showed non-Fickian moisture uptake exceeding 20%, while BFRP-epoxy experienced severe accelerated structural breakdown. Epoxy matrices demonstrated high susceptibility to leaching and mass loss (≈12% in BFRP-EP1), offering limited protection at elevated pH. This rapid fibre-matrix and matrix degradation exposed underlying basalt fibres to accelerated alkaline attack, causing visible fibre etching as supported by SEM-EDX. Crucially, natural concrete embedment caused a 70% interlaminar shear strength reduction for BFRP-EP1 within 540 days (representing 1.5% of a 100-year service life), confirming degradation pattern in simulated environment and demonstrating BFRP vulnerability to AAC pore solutions. Comprehensive molecular, microstructural (SEM-EDX, FTIR), thermomechanical (DMTA), and elemental leaching (ICP-OES) analyses identified the degradation mechanism as the inherent chemical instability of basalt fibres in alkaline media, not just matrix hydrolysis, while the selected vinyl-ester outperformed the specific tested epoxy system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biqai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: