Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The steel industry, one of the most challenging sectors to decarbonize, is responsible for approximately 5% of CO 2 emissions in the European Union and 7% globally. Achieving the goal of climate neutrality by 2050 requires reducing the industry’s reliance on carbon-based fossil resources, primarily natural gas and coal. This comprehensive review discusses the use of non-biogenic materials in the steel industry. Various types of waste play a significant role in a circular economy scenario. The circular economy approach is essential for achieving carbon–neutral steel production. The utilization of non-biogenic secondary carbon carriers, such as polymers from waste plastics and rubber from tires, serves as auxiliary reducing agents and slag foaming materials, supporting the smart carbon usage in a process integration framework. In cokemaking, replacing coal with non-biogenic materials has been identified as a cost-effective and sustainable solution. This approach aims to enhance the energy and resource efficiency of recycling processes for both post-consumer (end-of-life products) and post-industrial (materials produced during manufacturing) plastic-containing materials. Finally, the review examines methane cracking, which produces hydrogen and solid carbon. Methane cracking is a promising alternative to water electrolysis due to its lower energy demand, although it is not yet fully mature for industrial application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cirilli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: