Key result
Uncontrolled hypertension linked to higher cerebral resistance-area product and worse cognitive function.
Why the study?
Cognitive performance is affected differently over time in hypertensive patients, and traditional screening methods may be less sensitive in assessing certain cognitive domains, motivating evaluation of cerebrovascular hemodynamic parameters as alternative cognitive screening tools.
Cross-Sectional (n=115)
No
Absolute Event Rate: 1.7% vs 1.2%
p-value: p=<0.001
Elevated RAP may flag cognitive vulnerability in uncontrolled hypertension; leaves open its value as a TCD screening tool pending prospective trials.
Arterial hypertrophy and remodeling are adaptive responses present in systemic arterial hypertension that can result in silent ischemia and neurodegeneration, compromising brain connections and cognitive performance (CP). However, CP is affected differently over time, so traditional screening methods may become less sensitive in assessing certain cognitive domains. The study aimed to evaluate whether cerebrovascular hemodynamic parameters can serve as a tool for cognitive screening in hypertensive without clinically manifest cognitive decline. Participants were allocated into groups: non-hypertensive (n=30) [group 1], hypertensive with systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 140 and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 90 mmHg (n=54) [group 2] and hypertensive with SBP ≥ 140 or DBP ≥ 90 (n=31) [group 3]. Measurements of blood pressure and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity were obtained from digital plethysmography and transcranial Doppler. For the cognitive assessment, the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and a broad neuropsychological battery were applied. Patients in groups 2 and 3 show no significant differences in most of the clinical-epidemiological variables or pulsatility index (p=0.361), however compared to group 1 and 2, patients in group 3 had greater resistance-area product [RAP] (1.7 [±0.7] vs. 1.2 [±0.2], p<0.001). There was a negative correlation between RAP, episodic memory (r = -0.277, p=0.004) and cognitive processing speed (r = -0.319, p=0.001). RAP reflects the real cerebrovascular resistance, regardless of the direct action of antihypertensive on the microcirculation, and seems to be a potential alternative tool for cognitive screening in hypertensive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Machado et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=115). Uncontrolled hypertension vs. Controlled hypertension and normotension was evaluated on Resistance-area product (RAP) (p=<0.001). Uncontrolled hypertensive patients exhibited significantly higher cerebral resistance-area product (1.7 vs. 1.2) compared to controlled and normotensive groups, which negatively correlated with episodic memory and cognitive processing speed.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: