Key result
Reversible ischemia linked to ~2-point lower endocardial GLS compared to controls.
Why the study?
It is unknown whether layer-specific global longitudinal strain (GLS) has incremental value in diagnosing patients with reversible ischemia assessed by SPECT.
Observational (n=80)
Endocardial GLS reduction may indicate reversible ischemia; hypothesis-generating in this cohort and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Aims Two‐dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2DSTE) detects early signs of left ventricular dysfunction; however, it is unknown whether layer‐specific global longitudinal strain (GLS) has incremental value in diagnosis of patients with reversible ischemia assessed by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Methods and Results Eighty patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP), normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and no history of ischemic heart disease were retrospectively identified to have been examined by 2DSTE, SPECT, and coronary angiography (CAG). Patients with a normal SPECT constituted the control group, and patients with a positive SPECT were divided into patients with or without (true‐ or false‐ positive SPECT) significant stenosis assessed by CAG. GLS was measured for two myocardial layers (endocardial and epicardial) and as well as mid‐myocardial GLS. Patients with reversible ischemia had significantly lower GLS compared to the control group (GLSEndocardial: −19.0 ± 4.4% vs −21.4 ± 3.7%, P = .011; GLSEpicardial: −14.3 ± 2.9% vs −16.3 ± 2.9%, P = .004); GLSMid‐myocardial: −16.5 ± 3.6% vs −18.6 ± 3.2%, P = .006. This difference was even more evident in patients with a true‐positive SPECT (GLSEndocardial: −18.0 ± 4.4% vs −21.4 ± 3.7%, P < .001; GLSEpicardial: −13.6 ± 3.0% vs −16.3 ± 2.9%, P < .001); GLSMid‐myocardial: −15.6 ± 3.6% vs −18.6 ± 3.2%, P < .001. Notably, no significant differences existed in patients with a false‐positive SPECT. GLSEpicardial was the only independent predictor of coronary artery disease. In conclusion In patients with SAP and preserved LVEF, layer‐specific GLS at rest identifies patients with reversible ischemia. This seems to be evident only in patients with a true‐positive SPECT, thus, 2DSTE at rest might improve the diagnostic accuracy of a positive SPECT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hagemann et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Stable angina pectoris with reversible ischemia (n=80). Reversible ischemia on SPECT vs. Normal SPECT (control group) was evaluated on Endocardial global longitudinal strain (GLSEndocardial) (p=0.011). Layer-specific global longitudinal strain was significantly lower in patients with reversible ischemia compared to controls (endocardial GLS: -19.0% vs -21.4%, P=0.011).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: