Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Context: Anatomy in Ayurveda, or Rachna Sharir, is deeply rooted in classical Sanskrit texts. Traditional lecture-based methods, with limited visual aids, often struggle to effectively convey the complex concept of Rachna Sharir. Innovative tools like a virtual dissection table (VDT) offer detailed visualization of human anatomy, making it easier for students to comprehend the intricacies of the subject with considerable ease. Aim: To assess the impact of a VDT in increasing the comprehension of Ayurvedic anatomy among students with varying academic performance levels. Settings and Design: This stratified cross-sectional Study was performed with first-year B.A.M.S students. Materials and Methods: A cohort of 30 students, stratified into high-, medium-, and low-performing groups, was subjected to a traditional lecture session, followed by an interactive session with VDT, CADAVIZ. To measure comprehension, pre- and post tests were conducted before and after CADAVIZ sessions, respectively. Statistical analysis aided in assessing the effectiveness of the VDT across different performance groups. Results: The study results indicate that post test scores for all three groups were higher than their respective pretest scores. Before the CADAVIZ session, Group A, Group B, and Group C had average pretest scores of 71.5% ± 1.58%, 59.76% ± 1.47%, and 50.25% ± 2.53%, respectively. However, after engaging with CADAVIZ, their post test scores increased to 96.66% ± 3.16%, 79.31% ± 3.42%, and 65.93% ± 1.05%, respectively. This reflects a percentage improvement of 35.18% ± 4.2% for Group A, 32.71% ± 3.0% for Group B, and 31.21% ± 3.0% for Group C. Conclusions: The study confirms that VDT, CADAVIZ, effectively enhance anatomical understanding in Ayurveda students, benefiting all groups regardless of their academic performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sayyad et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: