Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two new oleanane‐type saponins: β‐d‐xylopyranosyl‐(1 → 4)‐6‐deoxy‐α‐l‐mannopyranosyl‐(1 → 2)‐1‐O‐{(3β)‐28‐oxo‐3‐[(2‐O‐β‐d‐xylopyranosyl‐β‐d‐glucopyranosyl)oxy]olean‐12‐en‐28‐yl}‐β‐d‐glucopyranose (1) and 1‐O‐[(3β)‐28‐oxo‐3‐{[β‐d‐xylopyranosyl‐(1 → 2)‐α‐l‐arabinopyranosyl‐(1 → 6)‐2‐acetamido‐2‐deoxy‐β‐d‐glucopyranosyl]oxy}olean‐12‐en‐28‐yl]β‐d‐glucopyranose (2), along with two known saponins: (3β)‐3‐[(β‐d‐Glucopyranosyl‐(1 → 2)‐β‐d‐glucopyranosyl)oxy]olean‐12‐en‐28‐oic acid (3) and (3β)‐3‐{[α‐l‐arabinopyranosyl‐(1 → 6)‐[β‐d‐glucopyranosyl‐(1 → 2)]‐β‐d‐glucopyranosyl]oxy}olean‐12‐en‐28‐oic acid (4) were isolated from the acetone‐insoluble fraction obtained from the 80% aqueous MeOH extract of Albizia anthelmintica Brongn. leaves. Their structures were identified using different NMR experiments including: 1H‐ and 13C‐NMR, HSQC, HMBC and 1H,1H‐COSY, together with HR‐ESI‐MS/MS, as well as by acid hydrolysis. The four isolated saponins and the fractions of the extract exhibited cytotoxic activity against HepG‐2 and HCT‐116 cell lines. Compound 2 showed the most potent cytotoxic activity among the other tested compounds against the HepG2 cell line with an IC50 value of 3.60μm. Whereas, compound 1 showed the most potent cytotoxic effect with an IC50 value of 4.75μm on HCT‐116 cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Sayed et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: