Protein function may depend not only on endpoint conformations but also on the ordered deformation histories through which they are reached. This distinction is relevant to allostery, conformational switching, mutation-induced rearrangements, and epistatic effects, where different perturbation sequences may produce similar visible structures while retaining distinct internal transport histories. Current state-centered or endpoint-centered representations do not always preserve this order-sensitive information. The practical motivation is therefore to provide a foundation for future descriptors of protein deformation trajectories that can distinguish ordered histories even when endpoint conformations are similar. Such descriptors could support analyses of allosteric switching, mutation-order effects, conformational memory, and path-dependent response in molecular-dynamics trajectories, NMR ensembles, structural families, and outputs of geometric generative models. We propose a deformation-first geometric framework based on quaternionic frame transport along the protein backbone. Local backbone frames are lifted to quaternionic variables, with infinitesimal rotation encoded by [Formula: see text]. Ordered concatenation of admissible deformation paths generates a noncommutative transport algebra, recording that deformation [Formula: see text] followed by [Formula: see text] need not be equivalent to [Formula: see text] followed by [Formula: see text]. From this ordered transport layer, we construct a spectral-response layer comprising a global Dirac-type operator, local spectral germs, a renormalized spectral density, and a mixed response form. A minimal realization on an idealized α-helix shows how localized pitch and bending perturbations can yield similar endpoint descriptors while producing a nonzero endpoint-derived ordered-transport discrepancy. At the formal level, the framework separates an order-sensitive transport-memory sector, lost under a commutative shadow, from a spectral-response sector that remains visible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: