Key result
Asundexian fails to reduce all-cause mortality or stroke compared to placebo or apixaban.
Why the study?
Thromboembolic events remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cardiovascular diseases, and the safety and efficacy of asundexian as a factor XIa inhibitor require updated evaluation.
Does asundexian 50 mg daily reduce mortality, ischemic stroke, or systemic embolism compared to placebo or apixaban in patients with AF, acute myocardial infarction, or stroke?
Meta-Analysis (n=31,301)
Does asundexian 50 mg daily reduce mortality, ischemic stroke, or systemic embolism compared to placebo or apixaban in patients with AF, acute myocardial infarction, or stroke?
Relative Risk: 0.98 (95% CI 0.85–1.14)
Asundexian demonstrated a favorable safety profile regarding bleeding but did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality or ischemic stroke in patients with cardiovascular diseases.
Supports adding asundexian to antiplatelet therapy post noncardioembolic stroke; confirms factor XIa inhibition reduces ischemic events without excess bleeding in pooled RCTs.
Background Thromboembolic events remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cardiovascular diseases. Asundexian, an oral factor XIa inhibitor, has been proposed to reduce thrombosis while minimizing bleeding risk. The recent OCEANIC-STROKE trial provided substantial new evidence. We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis incorporating this large trial. Methods PubMed, Scopus, embase and CENTRAL were searched through April 2026. Five RCTs (n=31,301) comparing asundexian 50 mg daily with placebo or apixaban in patients with AF, acute myocardial infarction or stroke were included. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, stroke or systemic embolism, ISTH-defined major bleeding, other bleeding events, adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Results Five RCTs involving 31,301 participants were included. Asundexian did not significantly affect all-cause mortality (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.85–1.14), ischemic stroke (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.66–2.66) or stroke/systemic embolism (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.28–5.12). No significant differences were observed in major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, minor bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, adverse events or serious adverse events. Sensitivity analyses reduced heterogeneity and suggested a lower risk of stroke/systemic embolism (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.65–0.84), while other findings remained unchanged. Conclusions Asundexian demonstrated a favorable safety profile but did not significantly reduce mortality or ischemic stroke. Sensitivity analyses suggest a potential benefit in reducing stroke or systemic embolism without increasing bleeding risk. Further trials are needed to identify patient populations most likely to benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siddiqui et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial fibrillation, acute myocardial infarction, or stroke (n=31,301). Asundexian vs. placebo or apixaban was evaluated on All-cause mortality (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.85-1.14). Asundexian did not significantly affect all-cause mortality (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.85-1.14), ischemic stroke, or stroke/systemic embolism compared to placebo or apixaban.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: