Key result
DOACs show no difference in in-hospital mortality compared with VKAs.
Why the study?
Canadian data on intracranial hemorrhage associated with oral anticoagulation is limited.
Cohort (n=143)
Yes
Absolute Event Rate: 34.5% vs 48.2%
p-value: p=0.26
Hypothesis-generating for comparable ICH outcomes with DOACs; randomized trials needed before practice change.
Background: Canadian data on intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) associated with oral anticoagulation is limited. Objectives: Primary study outcomes were baseline hematoma volumes and in-hospital mortality in patients with ICH associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Secondary outcomes included the use of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4f-PCC). Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients with ICH associated with oral anticoagulation in three tertiary care hospitals in Montreal, Canada, between 2011 and 2018. Results: Twenty-nine patients were receiving DOACs and 114 patients were under VKAs. Median baseline hematoma volumes were similar, 14.8 ml [5.7–42.8] in the DOAC group and 15.6 ml [5.9–38.1] in the VKA group (p = 0.91). In-hospital mortality rate was 34.5% in the DOAC group and 48.2% in the VKA group (p = 0.26). Only 17 patients (58.6%) in the DOAC group received 4f-PCC. Conclusion: Our study did not demonstrate significant differences in outcomes of ICH associated with DOACs versus VKAs. Management approaches were variable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duquet-Armand et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) associated with oral anticoagulation (n=143). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=0.26). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were associated with similar in-hospital mortality (34.5% vs 48.2%; p=0.26) and baseline hematoma volumes (14.8 vs 15.6 ml) compared to vitamin K antagonists.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: