As climate change accelerates, ecologically fragile regions are increasingly exposed to compound extremes. Agricultural intensification may perturb land–atmosphere feedback processes and exacerbate drought–heatwave coupling, yet the land-use thresholds governing non-linear risk amplification remain poorly constrained. This study focuses on a representative area in the agro-pastoral ecotone of northern China, the Horqin Sandy Land Ecological Conservation Area, to quantify cultivated-land-proportion thresholds for compound drought and heatwave onset. A space-for-time substitution was applied to 50 grid cells across five land-use patterns (cultivated land: 6.4%–70.62%). Surface temperature was the primary determinant of the surface energy balance (first-order sensitivity index = 0.54), with evapotranspiration exerting a stronger biophysical control than albedo. Month-specific thresholds were identified as 16.74% (June), 22.29% (July), and 19.48% (August). Partial least squares discriminant analysis indicated that soil conservation, climate regulation, and waste treatment were most responsive to threshold-based categorization. When the cultivated land proportion exceeded 40%, drought vulnerability exhibited a marked non-linear shift: the temperature–vegetation drought index increased by 82% (bootstrap 95% confidence interval: 61–103%), and drought–heatwave co-occurrence increased by 375% (bootstrap 95% confidence interval: 189–561%). These results provide a threshold-based quantification framework for climate-driven composite hazard risk, offering evidence-based early-warning benchmarks and land-use policy targets for drought-prone agricultural systems worldwide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: