Although defending behaviors represent early-emerging prosocial responses that can effectively counter peer aggression or bullying, age-appropriate measures for preschoolers remain scarce. Across two studies, we developed the Parent-report Preschool Defending Behaviors Questionnaire (PDBQ-P) and conducted an initial psychometric evaluation in a Chinese preschool sample. Study 1 ( N = 927 parents; M age = 4.92 years) used Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) to identify the dimensional structure of defending behaviors. Bootstrapped EGA supported a stable four-dimensional structure, including comforting victims, reporting to authority, aggressing against bullies , and physically interrupting bullies . Study 2 ( N = 752 parents at the 5-month follow-up) examined reliability, validity, and item-level invariance within the EGA framework. All subscales showed adequate internal consistency (αs = .66 – .88) and modest test–retest stability, as indexed by the Pearson correlations ( r s = .39 – .53) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs = .39 – .53). Construct validity was supported by positive associations with attention to others’ feelings ( r s = .17 – .44) and prosocial behaviors ( r s = .14 – .66), and differential associations with externalizing problems. Confirmatory factor analysis provided additional support for the EGA-derived four-factor structure. No items were flagged as noninvariant across time or gender within the permutation-based EGA framework. Overall, these studies developed the PDBQ-P as a parent-report measure of preschoolers’ defending behaviors and provided initial evidence for its psychometric properties and for the distinct forms of defending in early childhood.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: